GET RID OF THIS PATHETIC LABOUR GOV AT THE NEXT ELECTION!!!

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by -, Feb 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Guest

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... fit103.xml

    WHO THE FCUK DREAMED THIS CRAP UP :evil: :evil: :evil:

    Even though bigamy is a crime in Britain, the decision by ministers means that polygamous marriages can now be recognised formally by the state, so long as the weddings took place in countries where the arrangement is legal.

    advertisement
    The outcome will chiefly benefit Muslim men with more than one wife, as is permitted under Islamic law. Ministers estimate that up to a thousand polygamous partnerships exist in Britain, although they admit there is no exact record.

    The decision has been condemned by the Tories, who accused the Government of offering preferential treatment to a particular group, and of setting a precedent that would lead to demands for further changes in British law.

    New guidelines on income support from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) state: "Where there is a valid polygamous marriage the claimant and one spouse will be paid the couple rate ... The amount payable for each additional spouse is presently £33.65."

    Income support for all of the wives may be paid directly into the husband's bank account, if the family so choose. Under the deal agreed by ministers, a husband with multiple wives may also be eligible for additional housing benefit and council tax benefit to reflect the larger property needed for his family.

    The ruling could cost taxpayers millions of pounds. Ministers launched a review of the benefit rules for polygamous marriages in November 2006, after it emerged that some families had benefited financially.

    The review concluded in December last year with agreement that the extra benefits should continue to be paid, the Government admitted. The decision was not publicly announced.

    Four departments - the Treasury, the DWP, HM Revenue and Customs, and the Home Office - were involved in the review, which concluded that recognising multiple marriages conducted overseas was "the best possible" option. In Britain, bigamy is punishable by up to seven years in prison.

    Islamic law permits men to have up to four wives at any one time - known as a harem - provided the husband spends equal amounts of time and money on each of them.

    A DWP spokesman claimed that the number of people in polygamous marriages entering Britain had fallen since the 1988 Immigration Act, which "generally prevents a man from bringing a second or subsequent wife with him to this country if another woman is already living as his wife in the UK".

    While a married man cannot obtain a spouse visa to bring a second wife into Britain, some multiple partners may be able to enter the country via other legal routes such as tourist visas, student visas or work permits.

    In addition, officials have identified a potential loophole by which a man can divorce his wife under British law while continuing to live with her as his spouse under Islamic law, and obtain a spouse visa for a foreign woman who he can legally marry.

    "Entry clearance may not be withheld from a second wife where the husband has divorced his previous wife and the divorce is thought to be one of convenience," an immigration rulebook advises. "This is so, even if the husband is still living with the previous wife and to issue the entry clearance would lead to the formation of a polygamous household."

    Chris Grayling, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said that the decision was "completely unjustifiable".

    "You are not allowed to have multiple marriages in the UK, so to have a situation where the benefits system is treating people in different ways is totally unacceptable and will serve to undermine confidence in the system.

    "This sets a precedent that will lead to more demands for the culture of other countries to be reflected in UK law and the benefits system."

    Mr Grayling also accused the Government of trying to keep the ruling quiet because the topic is so controversial.
     
  2. Steelback

    Steelback New Member

    Another case of Rip off Britain - the more they let these buggers get away with it the more they will - country is a laughing stock. Should give the extra money to the squaddies and their families.
     
  3. James1987

    James1987 New Member

    That is disgraceful, first we're signing all our rights over to the EU, now we're changing what we have left to cater for other customs and cultures.

    But hey! we're Britain! we can afford it cant we?

    Pensioners don't need heat, it's not like they're vulnerable or anything...
     
  4. Steelback

    Steelback New Member

    Too many Effing do gooders - they need to clamp down on these spongers
     
  5. paul

    paul Administrator Staff Member

    That's a joke
     
  6. bwfc4eva86

    bwfc4eva86 New Member

    Shit goverment turning this country into a crap hole.

    We have a laughable transport system, and when money is spent on it, it all goes to the capital, erm im sorry but london has the flaming underground. There should be a high speed link between the north and the south to ease congestion on the roads.

    The health service needs sorting and wards cleaning.

    They talk of overcrowded prisons, well fucking chuck the life sentancees on a boat in the middle of the bloody atlantic, instead of giving them a plush room with ps2's etc. Forest bank is like a bloody hotel for fuck wits.

    Labour goverment are useless.
     
  7. Guest

    What a biker reading the Telegraph??? :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
     
  8. Steelback

    Steelback New Member

    :lol: Got the same news in the Sunday Sport underneath the Knockers :lol:
     
  9. Guest

    LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page